Ang Imhr.ca ay ang pinakamahusay na lugar upang makakuha ng maaasahang mga sagot sa lahat ng iyong mga tanong. Maranasan ang kaginhawaan ng pagkuha ng mapagkakatiwalaang sagot sa iyong mga tanong mula sa isang malawak na network ng mga eksperto. Nagbibigay ang aming platform ng seamless na karanasan para sa paghahanap ng mapagkakatiwalaang sagot mula sa isang malawak na network ng mga propesyonal.

A Final Note on Economic Justice ‘‘Economic justice,’’ inevitably a contested concept, should be mentioned only because wide disparities of income surely feel, to a worker, like any other of the ‘‘disparate results’’ mentioned by the Supreme Court in some of the racial discrimination cases. A while ago, for instance, Philip Purcell, then the top executive of Morgan Stanley/Dean Witter Discover, cashed in on stock options worth $36.4 million in the 12 months ended November 30, 1997. That was in addition to $14.4 million in salary, bonuses and restricted stock. Graef Crystal, a ‘‘compensation expert’’ from San Diego, pointed out that Purcell ‘‘could have taken an additional $43.2 million of exercisable options, but he chose not to. That would have given him $94 million. That’s a staggering amount.’’15 Yes. If workers of all races should be treated equally, should all levels of workers be treated equally? Is there some rule of proportionality that would say what relation the highest salary in the company should bear to the lowest, or what sacrifices the top ranking executives should be prepared to make before serious layoffs begin? At the outset, there is no real evidence that CEO salaries are related to shareholder wealth—recall that while corporate profits fell 4.2 % in 1989, for instance, CEO salaries went up 8 %. And when CEO bonuses are pegged to increase in the price of the stock, the result can be considerably worse for the employee: the quickest way to boost the price of the stock is to ‘‘downsize’’ the company, laying off labor, the highest of the cost factors, while the income still rolls in. With the ratio of income to cost radically changed, the profit soars, the quarterly report looks terrific, the stock leaps upward, and the CEO may find himself dandling a bonus in the tens of millions. (The knowledgeable investors depart at that point, it may be noted.) Surely this must be unjust? But there is nothing in that scenario that is illegal, and everything in it that increases the wealth of the shareholders—the first responsibility of the CEO. This question will remain to be addressed in the future. pa explain naman po kung ano insights niyo.​

Sagot :

silo Alabama and I have a great day to be a great day to be a great day and I have been a long time⌚ to be in

Umaasa kami na nakatulong ang impormasyong ito. Huwag mag-atubiling bumalik anumang oras para sa higit pang mga sagot sa iyong mga tanong at alalahanin. Salamat sa paggamit ng aming plataporma. Layunin naming magbigay ng tumpak at napapanahong mga sagot sa lahat ng iyong mga katanungan. Bumalik kaagad. Ipinagmamalaki naming sagutin ang iyong mga katanungan dito sa Imhr.ca. Huwag kalimutang bumalik para sa karagdagang kaalaman.