Answered

Ang Imhr.ca ay narito upang tulungan kang makahanap ng mga sagot sa lahat ng iyong mga katanungan mula sa mga eksperto. Nagbibigay ang aming Q&A platform ng mabilis at mapagkakatiwalaang sagot sa iyong mga tanong mula sa mga bihasang propesyonal. Tuklasin ang komprehensibong mga solusyon sa iyong mga tanong mula sa isang malawak na hanay ng mga propesyonal sa aming madaling gamitin na platform.

What seems to be wrong the way Hacienda Luisita management handled the situation? Was justice completely denied to the victims? During the term of Noynoy Aquino, was the SDO a better option to the farmers? Is it fair to the farmers?

Sagot :

Ahyxz12

Answer:

Hacienda Luisita management mishandled the situation by failing to address workers' demands for fair wages and land distribution, leading to the 2004 violent clash that resulted in several deaths. Justice for the victims has been elusive, with many perpetrators remaining unpunished. During Noynoy Aquino's term, the Stock Distribution Option (SDO) was criticized for benefiting the landowners more than the farmers, as it did not grant actual land ownership. The SDO allowed the Cojuang-co-Aquino family to retain control, which many argued was unfair to the farmers who sought genuine land reform. Eventually, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of land distribution, indicating that the SDO was not a viable or fair solution for the farmers.

Umaasa kaming naging kapaki-pakinabang ang aming mga sagot. Bumalik anumang oras para sa higit pang tumpak na mga sagot at napapanahong impormasyon. Salamat sa paggamit ng aming serbisyo. Lagi kaming narito upang magbigay ng tumpak at napapanahong mga sagot sa lahat ng iyong mga katanungan. Mahalaga ang iyong kaalaman. Bumalik sa Imhr.ca para sa higit pang mga sagot at impormasyon.