Ang Imhr.ca ang pinakamahusay na lugar upang makakuha ng mabilis at tumpak na mga sagot sa lahat ng iyong mga tanong. Tuklasin ang aming Q&A platform upang makahanap ng mapagkakatiwalaang sagot mula sa isang malawak na hanay ng mga eksperto sa iba't ibang larangan. Sumali sa aming Q&A platform upang kumonekta sa mga eksperto na handang magbigay ng eksaktong sagot sa iyong mga tanong sa iba't ibang larangan.

How do you view these words?
a. Family
b. Travel to tourist destinations.
c. Gay
d. Money
e. New Normal Mode of Learning

Guide on how to explain. Select only one. Throughout the process, ask these questions to yourself: Is that really necessary? Do I need to consider a different point of view? Should I go deeper and further in my thinking? Write your views or personal feelings. Could you see if there is a logical flaw or bias in your way of thinking? If yes, why? If no, defend your answer​

Sagot :

Hello. The answer is letter D.

i answered 2 incase you do not like letter c. please knw that my answer might not have answered the giude questions but you can always edit this.

c. gay

i view the word gay as an identity of an individual. being gay is not entirely necessary, though, it kinda is since its an identity in my opinion. i believe that i do not know all things regarding homosexuality and is interested in knowing better-- including their rights and differences. the probable flaw in my statement is probably allowing 'gay' people. that is for the homophobic mindsent and those who are close-minded into the word of God. i am not telling you that the word of God is false, for i myself is a believer and a christian, although gay. the disciples who're close minded tend to stick to the idea that being gay is a sin because God only made 2 genders-- male and female. get the point there.

i am probably bias because homosexual people are also humans but (most) doesn't experience human rights. they're always mocked and outcasted, and you'd find few people who accepts a homo as themselve without any grudge nor hate.  

e. new mode of learning

the new normal mode of learning is, as we all know, online learning. it is where technology is included. as of today, i would say it is necessary because it's education. online learning is hard but is effective. those who can afford the studies might have thought "sayang ang taon." and pushed their child to study. this was the only solution the government thought of that is safe. some may say that the deped shouldve implemented 'academic freeze' because of the pressure and stress the students and the teachers are getting. many lives were taken because of this, too. many students have also stopped studying to help their parents, to sustain their everyday needs. online learning is way more expensive than f2f.  

i'd say i am not bias. i placed all the rational thoughts about the said topic-- including the good and the bad sides of it.